For me, the circumstances surrounding Donna Lass' disappearance is one of the more interesting and under-examined aspects of the Zodiac Killer mystery. Donna Lass was a nurse who worked at a nursing station in a South Lake Tahoe casino in 1970. She'd previously lived in San Francisco nursing at Letterman Hospital. On the early morning of 26 September 1970, she left the casino without anyone noticing and was not seen from again. The next day a man phoned her employer and her landlord to say she'd left town due to a family emergency; the call was bogus and the man was never identified. It's actually in dispute whether any crime was committed, as there's no real evidence of foul play. It's possible (and not unheard of) for a person to "disappear" on their own and establish a new life elsewhere under an assumed identity.
Six months later the San Francisco Chronicle received a postcard apparently from the Zodiac Killer. The card referred to Lake Tahoe and the Sierra Club, claiming the number of his victims was now twelve, and to "peek through the pines." If the card was the work of the Zodiac (which is disputed), it seems he was claiming Donna Lass as his twelfth victim. (Zodiac counted the wounded and the terrorized as well as the murdered as "victims".) Some note this is a miscount; according to Zodiac's prior correspondence, Lass should've been victim number ten, another reason to doubt the card's veracity.
So, to grid this all out, Lass has three possible fates: foul play by the Zodiac, foul play by someone else ("her real assailant"), and a peaceful disapperance on her own accord. There are three possible authors of the Lass card: the Zodiac, someone else responsible for Lass' disappearance ("her real assailant"), and a hoaxster. This maps out to:
- (a) the Zodiac kidnapped/murdered Lass and the card was written by the Zodiac (Zodiac/Zodiac);
- (b) the card is by Lass' real assailant who used the Zodiac scare to throw the police and the public off his scent (assailant/assailant);
- (c) the card is by the Zodiac claiming credit for a victim he did not assail (assailant/Zodiac);
- (d) the Zodiac had nothing to do with a crime committed against Lass and the the card is a hoax (assailant/hoax);
- (e) no crime was committed against Lass but the Zodiac claimed credit for her disappearance (peaceful/Zodiac);
- (f) no crime was committed against Lass and the card is a hoax (peaceful/hoax); or
- (g) Zodiac was responsible for Lass and the card is a hoax (Zodiac/hoax).
In playing this little game of possibilities, I should note there are two combinations that don't make logical sense:
- (h) Zodiac kidnapped/murdered Lass and the card was written by her "real" assailant (Zodiac/assailant); and
- (i) Lass disappeared on her own and the card was written by her "real" assailant (peaceful/assailant).
Since there was no "real assailant" in these two cases, the card would be a hoax, which is dealt with above.
This is exhausting. Why my interest in all of this? Because Donna Lass' case highlights the mystery and dead-ends and ambiguities circling the Zodiac. The fact that seven of the above possibilities can be reckoned (or even six if (g) seems terribly unlikely to you) is just a taste of the combinatorics involved with researching this case. Almost any facet of the Zodiac will lead to this game of combinations and guessing, and picking one will knock against another "certainty", which I put in quotation marks because there's so few certainties here.
Zodiac never kidnaps victims -- unless you find Kathleen Johns' story reliable. Zodiac operated exclusively in the Bay Area -- take a closer look at Cheri Jo Bates. The postcard was a collage and not his trademark handwritten screed -- examine the Halloween card he sent Paul Avery. Proving Lass was a Zodiac victim is difficult, but so is eliminating her on the basis of surface details or serial killer "psycho-profiles." The Zodiac is a Gordian knot crossed with a Jenga tower.
Try typing "donna lass" into the search engine and follow the trail it offers. One of the more interesting paths you may find yourself is the question of Zodiac suspect Lawrence (or Larry) Kane, sometimes referred to as "Larry Krew". An investigator named Harvey Hines put together a
dossier against Kane which on first blush is damning, but like so many Zodiac researcher, Hines ignores certain facts that weaken or dilute his argument. The case against Kane depends a great deal on Donna Lass; research one and you'll wind up researching the other.
My interest in Donna Lass led me to test my search engine many times with her name to see what it was finding. The zodiackiller.com message boards came up with quite a bit of information, but very little elsewhere. What's more, I discovered her name had not been mentioned once in any of the newspaper articles I'd included, most of which came from the
Chronicle and the
San Francisco Examiner. Only in the past few days did I add a series of articles by Harry V. Martin of the
Napa Sentinel where she's briefly mentioned. (Martin's theory about Team Zodiac is either preposterous or fascinating, depending on how cynical I feel at any particular moment.)
It occurred to me then that my San Francisco-centrism was showing. I'd not bothered to locate newspapers outside of the city's two main dailies. A brief plain-Google search sent me to the
Tahoe Daily Tribune, and in thirty seconds I located seven (!) articles written in the past five years about Donna Lass and her connection to the Zodiac Killer. (This led me to start scouring other cities' newspapers; more on that in a future post, including one source so obvious I slapped my forehead when I located it.)
But now the kicker: Google wasn't indexing any of the
Tahoe Daily Trib's articles, therefore they don't appear in my custom search engine. I
hoped that by adding links to my search engine the Google crawler would magically go out and index them, but enough time has passed to know that's not happening. Thus a key weakness of Google's Custom Search Engine: if it's not in Google's main database, it's not in mine either. That may not seem like much of a deficiency, but I'd wager a great deal of Web space goes unindexed by Google; maybe five to ten percent? In any event, the
Trib's archive isn't being indexed and it's messing with the completeness of "This is the Zodiac searching ..."
I'm not sure why Google is ignoring the
Trib's archive. I've checked their robots.txt file and the article's META headers and nothing appears to be excluding the archive. My guess is that there are no direct links on the crawlable pages that would allow for Google to discover the archived content; if the only way to find them is to search the archive, that effectively blocks them from Google's spider, who isn't going to spend all day guessing keywords.
So, praying that Google will index my blog and therefore crawl on over to the
Trib's pages on Donna Lass, I've included all of them here. Hence another reason for this blog: I wanted some way to get Google to index unreachable articles as well as give those articles a little PageRank vote to boot.
Donna Lass at the
Tahoe Daily Tribune:
Some interesting searches on this subject: